Entry the forty-first: Is this numbering system too precious?
I liked it at first but as the number of posts goes up, maybe it's... ungainly. Anyone have any thoughts?
posted by Elinoire @ 7:44 PM
Monday, December 18, 2006
About Me
- Name: Elinoire
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
I (still) share a house the size of a postage stamp with a husband and two cats in a very urban area of the way-too-spread-out city of my birth (but not my entire life) and I used to correct other people's grammar for a living even though I let myself write run-on sentences.
Previous Posts
- Entry the fortieth: In which I continue to do stuf...
- Entry the thirty-ninth: In which I sometimes goof ...
- Entry the thirty-eighth: Um...
- Entry the thirty-seventh: Baking insanity
- Entry the thirty-sixth: Fifteen things
- Entry the thirty-fifth: In which I am really, real...
- Entry the thirty-fourth: Your anonymity is safe wi...
- Entry the thirty-third: Snags
- Entry the thirty-second: It starts...
- Entry the thirty-first: Someone else's art
5 Comments:
Actually I've been a little grumpy because I didn't think of it FIRST! I love it - keep it up!
I liked it at first and was even kinda bummed that I didn't come up with it and now....I'm with you. I think it's time to go.
(Hey, that reminds me of our conversation about being jealous of friend's success...)
:)
-S
It's cool...like you're Robinson Crusoe
Editrice
Or you could decide that the first, say, 50 posts were "limited edition individually serially numbered" posts, and then switch to the regular unnumbered production posts after that :)
I'm kinda with Carl on this. Go to 50, then blast off.
Post a Comment
<< Home